VFT tube leak

A special section just for steam engines and boilers, as without these you may as well fit a sail.
User avatar
fredrosse
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:34 am
Boat Name: Margaret S.
Location: Phila PA USA
Contact:

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by fredrosse » Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:01 am

Always keep the roller clean and well lubricated.
For new installation, a clean and smooth surface where the tube meets the tubesheet is necessary. Clean with Acetone or other completely vol ital solvent before rolling, and be sure oil does not contaminate the rolled joint.
wsmcycle
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:43 pm
Boat Name: FEARLESS,l'il steamy
Location: Fort Smith Arkansas USA

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by wsmcycle » Thu Dec 26, 2019 10:23 pm

I have the expander in hand. I see how to adjust the penetration depth. I do not know the sheet thickness of this Everett VFT boiler. I will set 1.0" deep. If the sheet is 1/2" then I will be stretching material above the sheet. Is that a problem? My guess is that I will know when i start to squeeze the tube against the sheet. I will know by the torque required. I wont know if i have swedged it enough (except the torque limitation of my arm in the firebox) to close the leak. My guess is that it will be very hard to turn and my swedging will be limited by the strength of my ARM ( singular, one arm) reaching in through the firebox door.
I am going to try tomorrow if I can get the tube ID cleaned well enough.

Any more pointer??
LIGHT THE FIRE!!
User avatar
Lopez Mike
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1903
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:41 am
Boat Name: S.L. Spiffy
Location: Lopez Island, Washington State, USA

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by Lopez Mike » Fri Dec 27, 2019 2:10 am

A 1/2' tube sheet would be fairly startling. How big is this boiler anyway!!!

If it's as much as 1/4" I'll be interested to hear. More like 3/16" I suspect.
If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping with a mosquito.
Dalai Lama
User avatar
fredrosse
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:34 am
Boat Name: Margaret S.
Location: Phila PA USA
Contact:

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by fredrosse » Sat Dec 28, 2019 4:23 pm

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section 1 - Power Boilers (Any boiler over 15 PSI) has a minimum tubesheet thickness required of 5/16 inch, and many launch sized boilers use 3/8 inch thickness. Anything with more thickness would usually occur with larger commercial boilers, but that is not often the case, the larger designs use stay-bolts and keep the tubesheets relatively thin.

Of course, many steam launch boilers are not designed to the Code, and most hobby boilers, much smaller, use tubesheet thickness far less than 5/16 inch.
User avatar
DetroiTug
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1863
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:56 pm
Boat Name: Iron Chief
Location: Northwest Detroit

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by DetroiTug » Sat Dec 28, 2019 8:41 pm

When we emulated Fred's boiler, we used 3/8" hot roll plate for the tube sheets and seamless sch 40 ASTM for the shell. It was plenty to roll in to and then seal weld. That boiler has never been fired to this day, only hydro'd. My brother sold it to a guy and he never used it, it's for sale I think.

-Ron
User avatar
fredrosse
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:34 am
Boat Name: Margaret S.
Location: Phila PA USA
Contact:

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by fredrosse » Sun Dec 29, 2019 1:02 am

Ron, where, and who, if you could find out I might buy it.
User avatar
Lopez Mike
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1903
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:41 am
Boat Name: S.L. Spiffy
Location: Lopez Island, Washington State, USA

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by Lopez Mike » Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:11 pm

Just something to think about:

I've always bored my tube sheets for a fairly close fit on the tubes. Maybe .002" per inch of tube diameter or even less. All very well until it was time to re-tube and then the scale buildup, however slight, makes it a big hassle to extract the old tube.

I've given a small bit of thought to making the initial fit much looser. Perhaps .01" per inch of tube diameter or more. It would seem to me that the act of rolling the new tube in wouldn't stress the tube excessively. They are, after all, seamless tubes. And when reaming out the end for removal of an aged tube, the reduced diameter of the rest of the tube would make life so much sweeter when sliding it out.

My memories of replacing the occasional tube on a full sized locomotive boiler are that they weren't that tight of a fit anyway. When welding on a new firebox end to an old tube, I don't recall doing a very neat job of dressing down the weld.

Thoughts?
If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping with a mosquito.
Dalai Lama
User avatar
DetroiTug
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1863
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:56 pm
Boat Name: Iron Chief
Location: Northwest Detroit

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by DetroiTug » Sun Dec 29, 2019 7:45 pm

fredrosse wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2019 1:02 am
Ron, where, and who, if you could find out I might buy it.
PM sent
User avatar
DetroiTug
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1863
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:56 pm
Boat Name: Iron Chief
Location: Northwest Detroit

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by DetroiTug » Mon Dec 30, 2019 8:18 pm

Quote: "I've given a small bit of thought to making the initial fit much looser. Perhaps .01" per inch of tube diameter or more."

Not sure I would go that much. I know the Stanley folks are always paranoid about their holes getting stretched too far :).. They say they can roll in about three times but I'm not sure how much larger that three rollings results in regards to any sort of dimension. Once the holes are oversized, it's boiler time. On the firetube we built, I reamed the holes 1.25" the same as the OD of the firetubes. We sanded the millshale off the tubes and they fit. And too, the holes were located in a CNC mill, so that helps with alignment issues.

-Ron
User avatar
fredrosse
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:34 am
Boat Name: Margaret S.
Location: Phila PA USA
Contact:

Re: VFT tube leak

Post by fredrosse » Tue Dec 31, 2019 1:55 am

I worked for a time at HOLTEC International, they make power plant heat exchangers, and the head of that division told me that a couple thousanths clearance on tubesheet holes is maximum. Rolling reduces the wall thickness of the tubes, and "work hardenes" the tube material, and should be minimized. Yes, much more difficult to extract an old tube, but that is the story I was told.

Typical ASTM A178 boiler tubes are NOT seamless, but I guess there can be seamless tubes procured.

I have often thought of swaging an increased diameter on the tube ends, to allow easier removal, but maybe just a good acid cleaning would do it, just an hour in hydrcloric acid cleans off all scale, leave it much longer and the acid starts to dissolve the bare steel.
Post Reply